Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Providence Service Corp. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how PRSC stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Transportation sector and Other Transportation industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Providence Service Corp. engages in the provision of home and community-based social services and non-emergency transportation services. It operates through the following business segments: Non-Emergency Transportation (NET) Services, Matrix Investment, and Corporate and Other. The NET Services segment operates under the brands LogistiCare and Circulation, which offers non-emergency medical transportation service for state governments and managed care organizations. The Matrix Investment segment provides home and mobile-based healthcare services for health plans. The Corporate and Other segment consists of executive, accounting, finance, internal audit, tax, legal, public reporting, certain strategic and corporate development functions and the results of its captive insurance company. The company was founded by Fletcher Jay McCusker in December 1996 and is headquartered in Stamford, CT.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)