Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Nuance Communications Inc. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how NUAN stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Technology Services sector and Packaged Software industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Nuance Communications, Inc. is the pioneer in conversational AI innovations that bring intelligence to everyday work and life. It delivers solutions that understand, analyze and respond to people, amplifying human intelligence to increase productivity and security. The firm operates through the following segments: Healthcare, Enterprise, Automotive, and Other. The Healthcare segment improves clinical documentation, improve quality of care, minimize physician burnout, integrate quality measures and aid reimbursement. The Enterprise segment engages in multi-channel access to customer service from the businesses they interact with is driving demand for AI-powered omni-channel engagement solutions. The Automotive segment provides embedded and cloud-based automotive solutions. The other segment includes SRS and Devices businesses The company was founded in March 1992 and is headquartered in Burlington, MA.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)