Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how MSGS stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Consumer Services sector and Movies/Entertainment industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. engages in the provision sports and entertainment business. Its sports franchises include the New York Knicks (Knicks), National Basketball Association (NBA), New York Rangers (Rangers), National Hockey League (NHL), New York Liberty (Liberty), Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA), Hartford Wolf Pack of the American Hockey League (AHL), Westchester Knicks of the NBA G League (NBAGL), and Counter Logic Gaming (CLG). It operates through the following segments: Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment, MSG Sports, and Corporate and Others. The MSG Entertainment segment features its live entertainment events, including concerts, family shows, performing arts and special events, which present or host in its diverse collection of venues. The MSG Sports segment promotes, produces, and presents a broad array of other live sporting events, such as professional boxing, college basketball, college hockey, professional bull riding, mixed martial arts, esports, tennis, and college wrestling. The company was founded on March 4, 2015 and is headquartered in New York, NY.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)