Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Cna Financial Corp. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how CNA stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Finance sector and Multi-Line Insurance industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
CNA Financial Corp. operates as an insurance holding company. Its products primarily include commercial property and casualty coverages, including surety. The firm’s services include risk management, information services and warranty and claims administration. The company operates through the following segments: property & casualty commercial insurance operations and outside property & casualty operations. The Property & Casualty Commercial Insurance Operations comprises of three segments namely Specialty, commercial and international. The Specialty segment provides professional, financial and specialty property and casualty products and services. The Commercial segment includes property and casualty coverages sold to small businesses and middle market entities and organizations primarily through an independent agency distribution system. The International segment underwrites property and casualty coverages. The Outside Property & Casualty Operations consists of two segments namely life & group and corporate & other. The Life & Group segment includes the results of the individual and group long term care businesses that are in run-off. The Corporate & Other segment involves in the corporate expenses, including interest on corporate debt, and the results of certain property and casualty business in run-off. The company was founded in 1897 and is headquartered in Chicago, IL.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)