Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Vistra Energy Corp. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how VST stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Utilities sector and Electric Utilities industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Vistra Corp. is an energy company, which engages in the provision of electricity and power generation. It operates through the following segments: Retail, ERCOT, PJM, NY/NE, MISO, Asset Closure, and Corporate and Other. The Retail segment sells electricity and related services to residential, commercial, and industrial customers. The ERCOT, PJM, NY/NE, and MISO segments focuses in the electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management activities, and fuel production and logistics management. The Asset Closure segment involves in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. The Corporate and Other represents the remaining non-segment operations such as general corporate expenses, interest, taxes, and other expenses related to support functions that provide shared services to operating segments and CAISO operations. The company was founded in 1882 and is headquartered in Irving, TX.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)