Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for H.B. Fuller Co.. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how FUL stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Process Industries sector and Industrial Specialties industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
H.B. Fuller Co. engages in the formulation, manufactures, and markets the adhesives, sealants, and other specialty chemical products. It operates through six operating segments: Americas Adhesives, EIMEA, Asia Pacific, Construction Products, Engineering and Royal Adhesives. The Americas Adhesives, EIMEA and Asia Pacific segments include a full range of specialty adhesives such as thermoplastic, thermoset, reactive, and water-based and solvent-based products. The Construction Products segment provides floor preparation, grouts, and mortars for tile setting; as well as sealants and related products for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning and insulation applications. The Engineering Adhesives segment produces and supplies industrial adhesives to the transportation, electronics, medical, clean energy, appliance, and heavy machinery markets. The Royal Adhesives segment involves in producing adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, and additives for use in commercial, industrial, and institutional applications. The company was founded by Harvey Benjamin Fuller in 1887 and is headquartered in St. Paul, MN.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)