Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Tootsie Roll Inds. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how TR stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Consumer Non-Durables sector and Food: Specialty/Candy industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. engages in the manufacture and sale of confectionery products. Its brands include tootsie roll, tootsie pop, charms blow pop, andes mints, sugar daddy, charleston chew, dubble bubble, razzles, caramel apple pop, junior mints, cella's chocolate-covered cherries, and nik-L-nip. Its principal markets include U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The company was founded by Leo Hirshfield in 1896 and is headquartered in Chicago, IL.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)