Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Redwood Trust Inc. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how RWT stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Finance sector and Real Estate Investment Trusts industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Redwood Trust, Inc. engages in the business of investing in mortgages and other real estate-related assets. It operates through the segments: Residential Lending, Business Purpose Lending, Multifamily Investments, Third-Party Residential Investments, and Corporate. The Residential Lending segment consists of a mortgage loan conduit that acquires residential loans from third-party originators for subsequent sale, securitization, or transfer into the investment portfolio. The Business Purpose Lending segment includes the platform that originates and acquires business purpose residential loans. The Multifamily Investments segment refers to the investments in securities collateralized by multifamily mortgage loans, as well as other investments in multifamily mortgages and related assets. The Third-Party Residential Investments segment contains the investment in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued by third parties, investments in Freddie Mac securitizations. The company was founded by George E. Bull III, Douglas B. Hansen and Frederick H. Borden on April 11, 1994 and is headquartered in Mill Valley, CA.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)