Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Genesis Energy L.P.. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how GEL stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Industrial Services sector and Oil & Gas Pipelines industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Genesis Energy LP operates as a master limited partnership, which focuses on midstream segment of the oil and gas industry. It provides suite of midstream services and produces natural soda ash. The company operates through the following segments: Offshore Pipeline Transportation, Sodium Minerals & Sulfur Services, Onshore Facilities & Transportation and Marine Transportation. The Offshore Pipeline Transportation segment owns interests in crude oil and natural gas pipeline transportation and handling operations through its offshore pipeline transportation segment, which focuses on providing a suite of services to integrated and large independent energy companies who make intensive capital investments to develop numerous large-reservoir, long-lived crude oil and natural gas properties in the gulf of Mexico, primarily offshore Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. The Sodium Minerals & Sulfur Services segment owns the leasehold position of accessible trona ore reserves in the Green River trona patch, a geological formation holding the vast majority of the world's accessible trona ore reserves. The Onshore Facilities & Transportation segment owns and leases integrated suite of onshore crude oil and refined products infrastructure, including pipelines, trucks, terminals, railcars, and rail loading and unloading facilities. The Marine Transportation segment provides transportation services. Genesis Energy was founded in December 1996 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)