Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Aecom. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how ACM stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Industrial Services sector and Engineering & Construction industry.
AECOM engages in the design, build, finance, and operation of infrastructure assets for governments, businesses and organizations. It operates through the following segments: Design and Consulting Services, Construction Services, Management Services, and AECOM Capital. The Design and Consulting Services segment engages in planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design services to commercial and government clients, such as transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water, and government. The Construction Services segment includes building construction & energy, and infrastructure & industrial construction. The Management Services segment refers to the program and facilities management and maintenance, training, logistics, consulting, technical assistance, and systems integration and information technology services primarily for agencies of the U.S. government and other national governments globally. The AECOM Capital segment engages in investing in real estate, public-private partnership and infrastructure projects. The company was founded on April 6, 1990 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)