Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for La-Z-Boy Inc. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how LZB stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Consumer Durables sector and Home Furnishings industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
La-Z-Boy, Inc. engages in the production of reclining chairs and manufacture and distribution of residential furniture. It operates through the following segments: Upholstery, Casegoods, Retail, and Corporate and Other. The Upholstery segment manufactures and imports recliners and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, sectionals, modulars, ottomans, and sleeper sofas. The Casegoods segment markets and distributes wood furniture such as bedroom sets, dining room sets, entertainment centers, and occasional pieces; and also manufactures some custom upholstered furniture. The Retail segment primarily sells upholstered furniture, in addition to some casegoods and other accessories, to the end consumer through the retain network. The Corporate and Other segment includes the shared costs for corporate functions, including human resources, information technology, finance, and legal. The company was founded by Edwards M. Knabusch and Edwin J. Shoemaker in 1927 and is headquartered in Monroe, MI.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)