Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Kforce Inc. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how KFRC stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Commercial Services sector and Personnel Services industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
Kforce, Inc. engages in the provision of professional and technical staffing services and solutions. It operates through the following segments: Technology and Finance and Accounting. The Technology segment focuses on the areas of information technology (IT) such as system architecture and development, project management, enterprise data management, business intelligence, artificial intelligence, machine learning, network architecture, and security. The Finance and Accounting segment offers services in relation with general accounting, business analysis, accounts payable, accounts receivable, financial analysis and reporting, taxation, budget preparation and analysis, mortgage and loan processing, cost analysis, professional administration, outsourced functional support, credit and collections, audit services, and systems and controls analysis and documentation. The company was founded in 1962 and is headquartered in Tampa, FL.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)