Our quantitative data points are meant to provide a high-level understanding of factors in equity risk models for Umb Financial Corp. Portfolio managers use these models to forecast risk, optimize portfolios and review performance.
We show how UMBF stock compares to 2,000+ US-based stocks, and to peers in the Finance sector and Regional Banks industry.
Please do not consider this data as investment advice. Data is downloaded from sources we deem reliable, but errors may occur.
UMB Financial Corp. operates as a financial holding company, which engages in the provision of bank and asset services. It operates through the Commercial Banking, Institutional Banking, Personal Banking, and Healthcare Services. The Commercial Banking serves the commercial lending and leasing, capital markets, and treasury management needs of the company’s mid-market businesses and governmental entities by offering various products and services. The Institutional Banking is a combination of banking services, fund services, and asset management services provided to institutional clients. The Personal Banking combines consumer services and asset management provided to personal clients. The Healthcare Services provides healthcare payment solutions including custodial services for health savings accounts and private label, multipurpose debit cards to insurance carriers, third-party administrators, software companies, employers, and financial institutions. The company was founded was founded in 1967 and is headquartered in Kansas City, MO.
Many of the following risk metrics are standardized and transformed into quantitative factors in institutional-level risk models.
Rankings below represent percentiles from 1 to 100, with 1 being the lowest rating of risk.
Stocks with higher beta exhibit higher sensitivity to the ups and downs in the market. (↑↑)
Stocks with higher market capitalization often have lower risk. (↑↓)
Higher average daily dollar volume over the past 30 days implies lower liquidity risk. (↑↓)
Higher price momentum stocks, aka recent winners, equate to lower risk for many investors. (↑↓)
Style risk factors often include measures of profitability and payout levels.
Companies with higher earnings generally provide lower risk. (↑↓)
Companies with higher dividend yields, if sustaintable, are perceived to have lower risk. (↑↓)